A claim is the maker's statement
Claims are voluntary marketing messages, separate from the information a label must carry, such as the ingredient list.1 In the EU they must meet six common criteria, from truthfulness to fairness, but those criteria deliberately do not define the wording a claim may use.2 In the US, the FDA does not approve labelling before sale and has no list of approved or accepted claims; labelling must be truthful and not misleading.3 So for most of the claims below, no official definition exists.
Thirteen common claims
| Claim | What it means | Official definition |
|---|---|---|
| Dermatologist tested | Tested on people under a dermatologist's supervision; a consumer survey alone does not support it | EU guidance only |
| Clinically tested | Tested on people under a medically or scientifically qualified professional, following a clinical protocol; it describes the process, not the result | EU guidance only |
| Hypoallergenic | Designed to minimise allergenic potential, with known allergens avoided; no guarantee against reactions | EU guidance only; none in the US |
| Non-comedogenic | The maker's claim that the product does not block pores, resting on whatever evidence the maker holds | None |
| Fragrance-free | No fragrance in the product; EU guidance rules out "free from perfume" if any ingredient has a perfuming function | None |
| For sensitive skin | The maker's description of who the product is for; EU authorities check it as a skin compatibility claim | None |
| Natural | Whatever the maker means by it; ISO 16128 offers a voluntary way to calculate natural origin content | None |
| Organic | In the US, agricultural ingredients certified under USDA rules; the seal needs at least 95% organic content | US: USDA rules; EU: none for cosmetics |
| Vegan | No animal-derived ingredients; EU guidance accepts "free from animal-derived ingredients" for products aimed at vegans | None |
| Cruelty-free | No animal testing; in the EU, testing cosmetics and their ingredients on animals for the cosmetics regulation is banned | None in the US; EU law sets conditions for "not tested on animals" |
| Preservative-free | No preservative; EU guidance says the claim should not be made if another ingredient, such as alcohol, protects the formula | EU guidance only |
| pH balanced | Undefined, and EU labels need not state the product's pH; one study put natural skin surface pH at about 4.7 | None |
| Alcohol-free | No ethyl alcohol; fatty alcohols such as cetearyl alcohol may still be present | None; the FDA explains the usage |
- Dermatologist and clinically tested: how to patch test a new skincare product explains what skin tests can and cannot show.
- Hypoallergenic, natural and organic: natural, organic and hypoallergenic cosmetics.
- Non-comedogenic: comedogenic ratings explained.
- Fragrance-free: fragrance free vs unscented.
- For sensitive skin: cosmetic labels and sensitive skin.
- Preservative-free and other "free from" claims: cosmetic preservatives and what clean beauty means.
- Alcohol-free: alcohol denat. in skincare.
- Tested claims, cruelty-free, vegan and pH balanced: below.
Tested claims: who tested, not what was found
EU guidance says "dermatologically tested" implies testing on people under a dermatologist's supervision, and that consumer self-assessment studies cannot support it. "Clinically tested" means testing on people under a medically or otherwise scientifically qualified professional, following a clinical protocol or in a clinical setting; the guidance says it refers to the expertise, process or conditions of the test. Consumers may expect such claims only where the results were favourable.4
The European Court of Justice found that the average consumer reads "dermatologically tested" as meaning the product was tested for its effects on the skin, with positive results showing it was well tolerated.4 The claim on its own does not say how many people took part, for how long, or with what skin. In the US, the FDA has no list of approved or accepted claims for cosmetics, these included.3
Cruelty-free and vegan
The US has no legal definition of "cruelty-free" or "not tested on animals". The FDA notes that a company may apply the claim only to its finished product while relying on suppliers or contract laboratories for any animal tests on ingredients, and that many raw materials were tested on animals when first introduced.10
EU law goes further. Article 18 of the cosmetics regulation bans testing finished cosmetics and their ingredients on animals in the EU to meet the regulation's requirements, and bans selling cosmetics whose formula or ingredients were tested that way.11 The testing ban on finished products has applied since 11 September 2004, and the last part of the marketing ban since 11 March 2013.14 A product may say no animal tests were carried out only if neither the maker nor its suppliers carried out or commissioned animal tests on the product, its prototype or any of its ingredients, or used ingredients tested on animals by others to develop new cosmetics (Article 20(3)).11 In the Commission's 2016 review of claims, four Member States found a rabbit logo or similar text on products whose responsible person could not show this for every ingredient.1
Vegan is defined in neither the EU cosmetics regulation nor the FDA's labelling regulations.1115 EU guidance names "free from animal-derived ingredients", in products intended for vegans, as a claim that helps people choose.4 On a list, animal-derived ingredients include Lanolin, refined from the fatty secretion of sheep16, and Cera Alba, which is beeswax.17 Vegan describes ingredients; whether anything was tested on animals is a separate claim.
pH balanced: a number the label leaves out
No cosmetics rule defines "pH balanced", and pH is not among the details an EU label must show (Article 19).11 Published measurements of skin surface pH range from 4.0 to 7.0; a multicentre study of 330 people estimated the natural value at about 4.7, and found that plain tap water raised it for up to six hours.12 Without the product's own pH on the pack, the claim cannot be checked against either figure.
What to look for on the label
- Claims you can check: fragrance-free, alcohol-free and vegan can be compared with the ingredient names. Tested and suitability claims cannot.
- Ingredient claims: in the EU, an ingredient a product claims to contain must be deliberately present.2 The list does not give its amount.
- Logos: a rabbit or a natural or organic logo means what the scheme behind it says. In the US, a product that does not meet USDA standards may not imply that it is USDA-certified organic.9
Paste a list into the skincare ingredient checker to see what each ingredient does and which are fragrance or named fragrance allergens. It checks the list, not the claims on the front, and never rates a product.
Sources
- European Commission. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on product claims made based on common criteria in the field of cosmetics, COM(2016) 580 final, 19 September 2016, section 3.3 (results of Member States' market surveillance). eur-lex.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 of 10 July 2013 laying down common criteria for the justification of claims used in relation to cosmetic products: recital 7, Articles 1 and 2, and the Annex (common criteria). eur-lex.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Food and Drug Administration. Cosmetics Labeling Claims (content current as of 21 November 2022). fda.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- Technical document on cosmetic claims, agreed by the Sub-Working Group on Claims and endorsed by the Working Group on Cosmetic Products (version of 3 July 2017), Annexes I to IV. Guidance for Regulation (EU) No 655/2013; not legally binding and not a European Commission document. ec.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Food and Drug Administration. "Hypoallergenic" Cosmetics, including the April 1978 FDA Consumer article on the court ruling (content current as of 25 February 2022). fda.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- Boozalis E, Patel S. Clinical utility of marketing terms used for over-the-counter dermatologic products. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 2018;29(8):841-845. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Food and Drug Administration. Allergens in Cosmetics (content current as of 9 October 2026). fda.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 16128-2:2017, Cosmetics: Guidelines on technical definitions and criteria for natural and organic cosmetic ingredients, Part 2: Criteria for ingredients and products (catalogue page and abstract, last confirmed 2023). iso.org refused automated access on 11 October 2026, so the page was read in the Internet Archive copy of 8 October 2025. iso.org Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program. Cosmetics, Body Care Products, and Personal Care Products (fact sheet, April 2008). ams.usda.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Food and Drug Administration. "Cruelty Free"/"Not Tested on Animals" (content current as of 25 February 2022). fda.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products, consolidated text of 18 May 2026. The article or annex entry relied on is named in each sentence citing it. Official Journal of the European Union. eur-lex.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- Lambers H, Piessens S, Bloem A, Pronk H, Finkel P. Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. International Journal of Cosmetic Science 2006;28(5):359-370. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Food and Drug Administration. "Alcohol Free" (cosmetics labeling claims; content current as of 25 February 2022). fda.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- European Commission, Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Ban on animal testing (cosmetics sector page). single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part 701: Cosmetic labeling, including section 701.3, Designation of ingredients (electronic CFR, current text). ecfr.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- European Commission. CosIng entry LANOLIN: INCI name, description and functions. ec.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- European Commission. CosIng entry CERA ALBA: INCI name, description and functions. ec.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
Written for this site from the sources above and checked against them on 11 October 2026. Not reviewed by a dermatologist or toxicologist, and not medical advice. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.