Clean is not a defined term
Neither EU cosmetics law nor the FDA defines clean for cosmetics. In the EU, Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 sets common criteria for every claim made in the labelling, sale and advertising of a cosmetic, in any medium, but it says those criteria are not meant to define or specify the wording a claim may use.1 In the US, the FDA does not approve labelling before products go on sale, and it has no list of approved or accepted claims for cosmetics.2
Dermatologists who studied the trend describe the same gap: there is no standard, scientific basis or regulatory oversight for how "clean" products are marketed or which ingredients they use.3 So the word means what the brand or retailer using it says it means, and two products that are both called clean can leave out different things. Related words have gaps of their own, covered in natural, organic and hypoallergenic cosmetics.
The rules every claim must still meet
Undefined does not mean unregulated. Article 20 of the EU cosmetics regulation says the labelling, sale and advertising of a cosmetic must not use text, names, trade marks, pictures or other signs to imply that it has characteristics or functions it does not have.4
Regulation 655/2013 then sets six common criteria for any claim: legal compliance, truthfulness, evidential support, honesty, fairness and informed decision-making. Two matter most for clean marketing: a claim must not present mere compliance with the legal minimum as a special benefit, and it must not denigrate competitors or ingredients that are legally used.1
In the US, cosmetic labelling, claims included, must be truthful and not misleading. The FDA regulates claims on labelling, and the Federal Trade Commission regulates claims in advertising.2
What a "free from" claim says, and what it does not
When a clean claim names what a product leaves out, it is a "free from" claim. A technical document endorsed by the EU's Working Group on Cosmetic Products, which the European Commission chairs, applies the six criteria to these claims from 1 July 2019. It is guidance rather than law: national authorities and courts decide, case by case, which claims are allowed.5
| Criterion | What the guidance says | Its example |
|---|---|---|
| Legal compliance | No "free from" claim for an ingredient EU law already bans in cosmetics | "Free from corticosteroids" is not allowed |
| Truthfulness | The ingredient must be neither present nor released by another ingredient | "Free from formaldehyde" is not allowed if the product contains a formaldehyde releaser such as Diazolidinyl Urea |
| Honesty | No claim that implies a guarantee the absence of an ingredient cannot give | "Free from allergenic substances" is not allowed: a complete absence of allergy risk cannot be guaranteed |
| Honesty | No claim to lack a function, such as preservative or perfume, while another ingredient performs it | "Free from perfume" should not be used if any ingredient has a perfuming function, whatever its other roles |
| Fairness | No claim based mainly on a presumed negative view of an ingredient's safety | "Free from parabens" should not be accepted, because it denigrates a whole group the regulation permits |
| Informed choice | Allowed when it helps a particular group of people choose | "Free from animal-derived ingredients" for vegans, or "free from acetone" in nail polish |
In short, a "free from" claim is expected to give a true and useful reason to choose, not to cast doubt on an ingredient the law allows. Being guidance, it does not stop every claim it advises against.
Whatever the wording, a "free from" claim names what is absent, not what took its place. In a 2022 study of 1,470 products sold as clean, phenoxyethanol appeared in 40.2% of them and benzoic acid or benzoates in 29.5%3, and both Phenoxyethanol and Sodium Benzoate are on the EU's list of permitted preservatives (Annex V, entries 29 and 1).4
Clean is not a statement about allergens
The authors of that study note that people seek out clean and natural products because of what they believe about safety. Their analysis of the ingredient lists found that 93.8% of the 1,470 products contained at least one ingredient they counted as a potential allergen, most often fragrances and botanicals, which appeared in 82.9%.3
That is a finding about labels, not a verdict on those products: the study counted ingredients, not reactions, and no list says how much is present or whether a given person will react. It does show that clean is no shortcut for anyone avoiding a particular ingredient. If your skin reacts easily, see what a label can tell someone with sensitive skin.
Read the list instead
A claim is what a brand chose to say; the list is what the product contains. Five steps put it to work:
- Name what you want to avoid, the way labels print it. What is INCI? explains why one ingredient can appear under more than one name.
- Search for families, not single words. Every paraben's name ends in -paraben, as in Methylparaben. Scent appears as Parfum or Fragrance, plus any named fragrance allergens and scented plant oils: see fragrance free vs unscented.
- Read to the end. EU lists may give ingredients below 1% in any order after the rest (Article 19)4, so preservatives and named fragrance allergens can be among the last names. See ingredient list order.
- Check the claim against the list. Under the EU guidance, anything a product says it is free from should be neither listed nor released by another ingredient.5
- Let a tool sort it. Paste the list into the ingredient checker, which shows groups such as Parabens, Fragrance and Essential oils as facts about each ingredient, so you can find what you choose to avoid.
Ingredients: Aqua, Glycerin, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Cetearyl Alcohol, Squalane, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Sodium Benzoate, Parfum, Limonene.
- AquaDissolves other ingredients
- GlycerinHelps attract water
- Caprylic/Capric TriglycerideSeals moisture in
- Cetearyl AlcoholSoftens and smooths
- SqualaneSoftens and smooths
- PhenoxyethanolKeeps the formula fresh
- EthylhexylglycerinKeeps skin in good condition
- Sodium BenzoateKeeps the formula fresh
- ParfumAdds scent
- LimoneneAdds scent
An illustrative list, not a real product. No paraben is listed, yet the formula is still preserved, by Phenoxyethanol and Sodium Benzoate. Parfum and Limonene show that it is scented.
What to look for on the label
- The word clean is the brand's own description, with whatever meaning the brand gives it.
- A "free from" list names what is absent. Find what replaced it in the ingredient list itself.
- Parfum, Aroma or Fragrance means a scent or flavour mixture was added, whatever the front says.
The ingredient checker never calls an ingredient clean, safe or unsafe, and gives no product a score: it shows what each ingredient does and what official sources say about it. The methodology explains why, and what an ingredient scanner can and cannot tell you covers what no list can answer.
Sources
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 of 10 July 2013 laying down common criteria for the justification of claims used in relation to cosmetic products: recital 7, Articles 1 and 2, and the Annex (common criteria). eur-lex.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- US Food and Drug Administration. Cosmetics Labeling Claims (content current as of 21 November 2022). fda.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- Tran JM, Comstock JR, Reeder MJ. Natural is not always better: the prevalence of allergenic ingredients in "clean" beauty products. Dermatitis 2022;33(3):215-219. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Checked 11 October 2026.
- Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products, consolidated text of 18 May 2026. The article or annex entry relied on is named in each sentence citing it. Official Journal of the European Union. eur-lex.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
- Technical document on cosmetic claims, agreed by the Sub-Working Group on Claims and endorsed by the Working Group on Cosmetic Products (version of 3 July 2017), Annexes I to IV. Guidance for Regulation (EU) No 655/2013; not legally binding and not a European Commission document. ec.europa.eu Checked 11 October 2026.
Written for this site from the sources above and checked against them on 11 October 2026. Not reviewed by a dermatologist or toxicologist, and not medical advice. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.